I Come To You In Pieces

I'm Jasper and I blog about Criminal Minds, social justice and other crap. I wear queer-tinted glasses and react to most things with gifs.

I obsessively tag things, so check my link/tag page.

"weird shit happens here" - Sophie

gh3tt0fabul0us:

EA GAMES

challenge everything


mia-the-wonder-slut:

josepha-olala:

hoytie-toitie:

magalomania:

latinegro:

stuish:

tumblrofthrones:

kissedxfire:

Attention ASOIAF and Game of Thrones fandom:
This video game comes out tomorrow, and I want everyone here to know that they left women out of this Game of Thrones RPG, or shall we say otherwise reduced them to non-playable characters who give out orders and/or are prostitutes. This is shouldn’t be acceptable when the developers promised to respect the world Martin built in the ASOIAF. For more details, read the full post at Kissed by Fire here. 
Fandom, I think it’s time to take a stand. Don’t buy this game. 

What is this fuckery? Relegating women to NPC roles, that’s just a lovely metaphor all types of sexist shittiness.

How grossly disappointing. I was really looking forward to this game.

Wow…that is crazy! Some of the best characters in the books and the shows are WOMEN! Not all women in either case are prostitutes and handmaidens. Shit, Daenerys commands dragons and Brienne is a Knight! That shit is unacceptable. I thought about buying this game…I wont now.I will stick with Arkham City where I can choose to actually play as Cat-Woman

Makes no sense.

This makes me so sad. I would love to play as Arya or Catelyn or Daenerys, hell, even Sansa as she seems to become less of a twat in ASOFAI
sad days. sad days indeed :[

What a weid decision to make while the story gives so many strong female characters… to make those playable should have been a must. I find it sad that the game seems to forget or even try to downplay one of the parts that I love most about the realm of Westeros… The important roles of women!

Not only is there no female playable characters, despite the importance placed on women in ASOIAF, but the women that are in the game seem to be objectified and devalued. DISAPPOINT. But that’s what happens when you place a story that is already marginally problematic in the hands of white male game designers. They make it even more problematic. Le sigh, such is the whoa of women in fantasy and video games.

mia-the-wonder-slut:

josepha-olala:

hoytie-toitie:

magalomania:

latinegro:

stuish:

tumblrofthrones:

kissedxfire:

Attention ASOIAF and Game of Thrones fandom:

This video game comes out tomorrow, and I want everyone here to know that they left women out of this Game of Thrones RPG, or shall we say otherwise reduced them to non-playable characters who give out orders and/or are prostitutes. This is shouldn’t be acceptable when the developers promised to respect the world Martin built in the ASOIAF. For more details, read the full post at Kissed by Fire here

Fandom, I think it’s time to take a stand. Don’t buy this game

What is this fuckery? Relegating women to NPC roles, that’s just a lovely metaphor all types of sexist shittiness.

How grossly disappointing. I was really looking forward to this game.

Wow…that is crazy! Some of the best characters in the books and the shows are WOMEN! Not all women in either case are prostitutes and handmaidens. Shit, Daenerys commands dragons and Brienne is a Knight! That shit is unacceptable. I thought about buying this game…I wont now.

I will stick with Arkham City where I can choose to actually play as Cat-Woman

Makes no sense.

This makes me so sad. I would love to play as Arya or Catelyn or Daenerys, hell, even Sansa as she seems to become less of a twat in ASOFAI

sad days. sad days indeed :[

What a weid decision to make while the story gives so many strong female characters… to make those playable should have been a must. I find it sad that the game seems to forget or even try to downplay one of the parts that I love most about the realm of Westeros… The important roles of women!

Not only is there no female playable characters, despite the importance placed on women in ASOIAF, but the women that are in the game seem to be objectified and devalued. DISAPPOINT. But that’s what happens when you place a story that is already marginally problematic in the hands of white male game designers. They make it even more problematic. Le sigh, such is the whoa of women in fantasy and video games.



livesinfiction replied to your post: livesinfiction replied to your post: Can I add you…

/runs off to check out Wetopia and add you in the process XD

wetopia is actively based around donating to charity, that’s the reason i tried it out


livesinfiction replied to your post: Can I add you on Castleville?

Oooh. What other games do you play, if you don’t mind my asking/butting into this conversation? XD

currently castleville, the avengers game, and wetopia (shh i saw it on the ellen show lol). i kinda cycle through what i play.


why is there a giant dragon in my kingdom

 


spiritinthenight replied to your post: how men think female gamers are generally treated…

guys literally send rape threats to girl gamers? shit, I never even knew that went on.

it’s not even a rare occurrence tbh. and when you’re playing with headsets, it’s actual spoken threats, not just typed ones.

and these are actual descriptive threats, not just the whole gaming phenomenon of “rape” used in place of “beat” (“i totally raped the other team!”)


how men think female gamers are generally treated by male gamers:

  • cool, i love girl gamers
  • aww you’re so bad at this but you’re cute and adorable for trying
  • whatever, let’s play

how female gamers are generally treated by male gamers:

  • you suck!
  • wow a girl gamer that’s so hot!!!
  • omg why do girls go on about liking games so much it’s no big deal gaming culture isn’t sexist! but no this is clearly a man’s game i mean look at the tits on that
  • i bet you’re ugly/fat
  • get back to the kitchen
  • SEND ME NUDES
  • bitch whore dyke slut
  • rape threats in various detail

My comic about online gaming as a girl

geekquality:

oatmeal:

A lot of people seem grumpy about my latest comic about online gaming as a girl.

I wasn’t implying that girls suck at games. I was implying two things:

  • When girls play, often times no one takes them seriously. 
  • If they screw up, often times the room is filled with lonely dudes who say things like “LOL that’s okay! Will you marry me?”    If I screw up I get eviscerated.

In short: a terrible female gamer gets away with way more than a terrible male gamer (like me).


This came from my recent escapades playing Left4Dead online.

Again, I meant no ill toward lady gamers.

-Matthew

Matthew, you will NEVER know what it’s like to be a woman gamer, so let me try to explain this in terms you can understand.

IN WHAT WORLD DOES THIS HAPPEN? Honestly? Women gamers get away with FAR less than male gamers, and not only that, but even when they ARE excellent players, they still get hate. They still get threats of rape, demands for nude photos, detailed descriptions of the sexual assault that their male counterparts threaten them with. They get called “slut”, “whore”, “bitch”, “dyke”, and a whole slew of other terrible things. 

Check out Fat, Ugly or Slutty, a blog dedicated to women telling the tales of their experience in gaming, and then tell me that guys “go easier on women”. 

I don’t expect you to read this, but it’s worth a shot. I’m seriously disappointed, and officially no longer an Oatmeal fan. 

-AM


Don’t Be Evil: How Google Screwed a Startup

hatchlingsblog:

After trying to go through the “proper channels” for almost a year now it’s time to share this story of how Google screwed over our startup with the world.

Hatchlings is the world’s largest Easter Egg hunt. We have over 3.5 million users spanning all 50 states and almost every country on Earth. We have been in operation for over 4 years and are launching our new version, Hatchlings 2, this spring.

In a nutshell: Google bid on, displayed, and then failed to pay for over $40,000 of advertising space on Hatchlings. They have since stonewalled us for almost a year, locking us out of our accounts, screening our phone calls, ignoring our emails, and making it a living hell to figure out what exactly went wrong.

What you can do to help: please share, tweet, and reblog this post. Help us get the word out so that others don’t fall into this same trap.

———————————————-

Since early 2008 we have been running the world’s largest Easter Egg Hunt on Facebook and hatchlings.com. We have amassed a loyal following of users from all over the globe who have spent untold hours collecting over 1,300 unique eggs and pets.

We are a bootstrapped startup located in Des Moines, Iowa and now have a full-time team of 5 and are currently looking to hire 2 more. We owe many thanks to our paying users for supporting us by purchasing premium memberships and eggs over the years. Without you we would be out of business right now.

Because of Google.

Our relationship with Google started out great, continued on great for several years, and in an instant they banned us, confiscated two months of our earnings, and have never contacted us again despite our repeated efforts.

Let’s go through a brief timeline of our relationship with Google. (Links will open supporting documentation or referenced email correspondence)

  • February 2006: I sign up for a Google Adsense account.
  • 2006-2008: I use Adsense on some personal websites with minimal traffic.
  • February 2008: Hatchlings is launched out of my dorm room at Iowa State. I include Google Ads as a revenue model from the start.
  • Spring 2008: Hatchlings takes off. The Google ads start making money.
  • October 2008: Worried that our rapid growth might trip some sort of trigger at Google I reach out to Matt Cutts who sets us up with our first account manager at Google, Debby Chang.
  • October 2008: Debby and I had our first optimization call and she made suggestions about our ad placements, etc. They first mention selling Hatchlings branded eggs to advertisers.
  • February 12, 2009: Google raises concerns about one of my personal websites. I immediately take down the ads on the site since Hatchlings is much more important. Debby assures us on February 12 that “your AdSense account remains in good standing and any actions taken on this domain do not affect the performance of your other AdSense ads.” This is the only issue that has ever been raised by Google in regard to our account.
  • February 24, 2009, Debby contacts me with an urgent proposal to release a Marley & Me branded egg to coincide with their DVD release along with a full ad-buyout of Hatchlings’ ad inventory.
  • The rest of 2009: More optimization calls, good working relationship.
  • Also in 2009: Google is still working on finding an opportunity for them to sell deeply integrated ads.
  • Throughout 2010: more of the same. Good working relationship. No concerns raised about Hatchlings’ compliance, etc. We launch hatchlings.com to distance ourselves a bit from the Facebook platform.
  • January 2011: We get an email from our new account manager at Google, Laura Sergio.
  • February 25, 2011: Our last correspondence with Laura was February 25, 2011.
  • April 18, 2011: So you can imagine my surprise when less than two months later we received an automated email that said “After reviewing our records, we’ve determined that your AdSense account poses a risk of generating invalid activity… we’ve found it necessary to disable your AdSense account. Your outstanding balance and Google’s share of the revenue will both be fully refunded back to the affected advertisers.” [emphasis mine] As we were locked out of our account we don’t know the exact amount of credited money that was taken back but based on historical data it is in the range of $40,000. This is for ads that were already shown on our site from February 1 to April 18.
  • April 18, 2011: thinking this was obviously a mistake and that some algorithm had flagged us with a false positive of some kind I followed an appeal and reached out to our account manager, Laura.
  • May 4, 2011: the appeal was summarily denied. Our account manager never returned my calls or emails.
  • May 2011: at this point we started exploring what our options were. We found out that some people had success filing a super-detailed second appeal form itemizing the Adsense terms of service and explaining how they were not in violation. Although, if you’ll note, Google never even claimed we were in violation of their terms.
  • July 21, 2011: after an extensive review of our records, the Google terms, our historical correspondence with Google, etc. We filed a very detailed second appeal. We also included some extra sources such as traffic stats and email records (not linking to them here as they contain some confidential info).
  • September 2011-Present: Google never replied to our second appeal so we started trying to explore other channels to get this issue resolved. Contacting someone through their lobbying arm via a personal connection yielded nothing. Getting in touch via the Startup America Partnership was unsuccessful.

    The closest we can get to an answer is “oh yeah we’ll look into it and see what we can find”… then silence. We still don’t even know what it is that we supposedly did wrong.
  • We even sent them the full text (including the links to the supporting emails!) of this blog post last week before publishing with no reply.

We have been advised that to sue Google (even though we are completely in the right and would probably win) would cost more money than we’d get out of it. We are just spreading the word about what happened to us to help other startups.

The moral of the story is to be careful when planning your business that one “partner” company can’t pull the rug out from under you. While this is a story about Google it could very well have been another large “partner.” Who does your business hinge on? A lot of startups accept the implied risks of building on “platforms” or having big, faceless “partners” form an integral part of their business foundation without a second thought.

We were very fortunate to have a diversified revenue stream with paying users to support us and help us remain a viable business even after losing a large chunk of advertising revenue (and we thank our users from the bottom of our heart for that) but others wouldn’t have been so lucky.

Personal Note to Google: I realize that this probably wasn’t done maliciously and that we were probably caught up in some algorithm gone awry. And I also realize that for the amount of money we’re talking about you probably don’t even consider this to be an issue worth your time. But for a startup like us this is a huge deal. Feel free to reach out.. you have my cell number and email address. But after almost a year of being ignored I’m not holding my breath.

What you can do to help: please share, tweet, and reblog this post. Help us get the word out so that others don’t fall into this same trap.

Media Roundup: Startup Iowa, Silicon Prairie News, DM Reg, Hacker News, Business Insider, Tech Meme, The Economist